Illuminated Manuscripts

Years ago, I remember someone talking about their college class in medieval history, or something similar. One of their assignments, which sounded awesome, was to copy out by hand a manuscript page from your classmate, passing it from person to person over the course of the semester, to see how it turned out in the end. They each were given rules, like one person didn’t like words alone on a line, and another liked larger margins. At the time, I thought they were a little exaggerated, to imitate the effect of years of copying during one semester.

Now with my experiences at the day job, I don’t know about those particular rules, but I feel like I have a much more visceral feel for how drift would happen in copied manuscripts.

I do the final formatting and production on the majority of our reports. Part of that is inserting all the graphics, so I get a list of people’s captions to go with the graphics when I put them in. The variation in styles, even from people working from the same company style guide, is hilarious. Obviously, it’s easy to tell everyone the correct font, but you get all kinds of little idiosyncratic differences in the text:
-The coworker who abbreviates everything possible: “Site overview, view SE”
-The coworker who forgets that you shouldn’t start sentences with numbers: “1907 map showing the site area.”
-The coworker who doesn’t remember that we can add arrows and labels directly on the photo, so locations don’t have to be described in the text: “Site overview, note cobble accumulation left foreground, gully center background, and datum at living tree nearest old snag in left middle background.
-The coworker who clearly would rather not be writing captions: “Site 1.”
-The coworker who thinks “caption” really means “small novel”: “Site overview, view across the rolling hills at the north of the project area, down to the gully that runs parallel to the old railroad grade recorded as Site 2. South of site 2, the project area slopes more steeply, with increased vegetation.

And the ironic thing is, I’ve developed my own rules that I apply to everyone’s captions. It makes the company’s reports consistent, and most of my rules are based on ones of my supervisor’s that she taught me when she passed on the task, but they’re not really any less arbitrary in some cases. Not starting a sentence with a number is a grammar thing, but does it really matter if it says “view SE” or “view to the southeast”? But I feel very strongly about it!

As I’m sure manuscript copiers once did…

Posted in ye olde day job | Leave a comment

Steak and Ice Cream

Conversations with family:

[Dad and I are discussing cooking shows while he gets himself ice cream]
Me: I would lose so badly on those things. I couldn’t even cook a steak, because I don’t eat them.
Dad: Well, you eat them in restaurants. But that doesn’t help you cook it at home, though. [He chips ineffectively at the ice cream, which just came out of the chest freezer]
Me: You could put it in the microwave.
Dad: [stares] They’d arrest you!
Me: [confused] I know it melts faster at the sides, but you can scoop at the sides first?
Dad: Oh. The ice cream. Not the steak.

Posted in family, humor around me | Tagged as: | Leave a comment

Link round-up!

A short post this week, because there is a longer one for you to all read where I guested over at the Qwillery.

If you’re getting impatient, you can also now read the first two chapters of SILVER, up at Tor.com!

Finally, I’ve added my signings to the Appearances tab up top there, if you live in the Northwest area and want to come out and see me in another month and a half!

Posted in novels, thinky thoughts | Tagged as: | Leave a comment

Family Stories

Shopped for a new pillow today, which I always find vaguely embarrassing. Mattress stores, you’re expected to climb up and loll around, but when I’m being indecisive about pillows, I end up feeling rather silly standing in housewares fondling different firmnesses.

I do feel like I’m asserting some fundamental right, though. (Life, liberty, and fluffy pillows!) Back when I was a kid, the first time the sister and I got new mattresses and we were old enough to participate in choosing them, Dad joked that we were getting new mattresses because my mother didn’t get a new pillow as a child. Apparently, hers was terrible and uncomfortable and worn out, and my grandfather maintained it was perfectly good and wouldn’t get her a new one.

So one night she switched hers with his.

She didn’t remember the details, but come bedtime, there was a huge explosion, and the old cruddy one came boomeranging right back to her room. And she didn’t get a new one!

So now I exercise my right to have a new pillow whenever I want! (And probably past time too. I squish pillows in my sleep, so mine have a hard life…) But I could have gotten it at any time!

Posted in family | Leave a comment

Norwescon Schedule

It’s that time again! Here’s my schedule for Norwescon:

Friday 2 pm Cascade 6
Creature Feature
What are our favorite fantasy creatures, and why? Do the fantasy archetypes (vampire, werewolf, fairy, etc.) give us a shortcut to understanding a particular character and their motivation? How do authors use these creatures as metaphors for our own personalities and desires?
Sir R.L. McSterlingthong (M), Rhiannon Held, Duane Wilkins, Heather Hudson

Friday 7 pm Cascade 5
Residential Writing Workshops: Clarion and More
Learn about the major genre workshops like Clarion, Clarion West, Odyssey, Viable Paradise, and more. Are you ready to attend a residential workshop? What will you learn? Each workshop has advantages and disadvantages, so which workshop will work best for you?
Rhiannon Held (M), Tina Connolly, Erin A. Tidwell, K.C. Ball

Saturday 12:30 pm Cascade 1
Rhiannon Held reads Silver
An urban fantasy novel Rated PG
Rhiannon Held

Saturday 5 pm Cascade 8
How I Sold My Novel
Some debut novelists discuss the path they took in selling their first novel.
Rhiannon Held (M), Dennis R. Upkins, Christopher Paul Carey

Sunday 1 pm Cascade 3&4
The Art of Critique
A writer must learn to critique both her own work and the work of peers. What makes a good critique? How do you critique yourself and how do you critique someone else?
Rhiannon Held (M), Leslie Howle, bewarethesmirk, Paul Dixon

Also, I have a giveaway going on, that will finish a little after the con. Get a signed ARC of SILVER and read it before it’s released!

Goodreads Book Giveaway

Silver by Rhiannon Held

Silver

by Rhiannon Held

Giveaway ends April 14, 2012.

See the giveaway details
at Goodreads.

Enter to win

Posted in travel | Tagged as: | Leave a comment

Metaphor for the Moon

Mmm. Tonight, I am full of corned beef and still grinning from seeing cute kids (and talented older kids) do Irish dancing at the Seattle Center. I bring to you a link, and also a new edition of Fun with Google: Unnecessary Metaphors.

First, the link. I am not the only person to talk about about how narratively interesting reality TV is. Here talks about the Food Network show Chopped, and how it applies to writing.

Now for Fun with Google: Unnecessary Metaphors. You may recall that after “metaphor for cheese” randomly started showing up in my website stats as a search result that had brought people to the website, I started courting it. Metaphor for cheese and all its variations has been surpassed for that last few months by metaphor for bears, though that one was a slow build that I thought might not take off. But it’s time for a new one. Thus!

Metaphor for the Moon:

The moon is like an expensive restaurant, in that it gives everything an indefinable sort of romantic ambiance, and you think wow, this is awesome, and also romantic, and everything’s soft and glowing and then you realize that what use is ambiance when you can’t read the goddamn menu or see that root sticking up in the path on your moon-lit walk and so it’s great to gaze at, but not as much fun to try to find your way back to the cabin when all the trees look the same or actually eat there when you can’t see what you’re eating.

Posted in humor around me, movies and TV | Tagged as: | Leave a comment

In your refridgerator

[In the midst of a conversation about what kind of romantic elements we liked in our fiction]

Me: I like my melodrama in my melodrama
Not in my adventure stories

Friend: I misread that for ‘melondrama’ for a second and started considering what a melon love story would look like.

NO CANTELOPE. WE CAN NOT BE TOGETHER, WE COME FROM OPPOSITE SIDES OF THE CRISPER.

BUT WATERMELON, I CANNOT CONTAIN MY FEELINGS FOR YOUR JUICY INNER SOUL.

Posted in humor around me | Tagged as: | Leave a comment

Sounding board carpentry

Finished up a structural revision yesterday on book 3–it wasn’t like one of my usual full revision passes, but the structural element I decided to fix had far-reaching consequences, so rewriting still took a bit. Next up, a short story for an anthology, and then back for a proper deep revision pass.

This new short story got me thinking about my brainstorming process, particularly the part where I use someone as a sounding board, rather than doing it all on my own. For this story, I used the sister, who is the best brainstormer ever, partly because we are on a mental wavelength, and partly for reasons explored below. It struck me how for my writing process, brainstorming with a quality sounding board was like moving house with a friend. Leaving aside big furniture, you can move all on your own, either through a marathon effort or chipping away at it load by load, but having someone to help and encourage and keep you focused and carry heavy things with makes it so much smoother and faster.

In the way of things popping at the same time that relate to each other, I was linked to this recently:

This is a (hilariously) BAD sounding board, obviously. It got me thinking about what makes a good sounding board, though. Obviously, one needs someone at least familiar with the genre you’re working in, but not necessarily someone else who creates in that genre. Someone who reads/watches in it can work just as well. The sister is not a writer, after all. All you need is for them to have a sense of “in [genre] A can cause B”, so when you need B, they can suggest A. That’s the key part for the best sounding boards, is the suggestions: it’s less than they need wild ideas, it’s that they need to have a mind that looks for solutions. At least in my process, by the time I get to the sounding board part, I have plenty of ideas, but a bunch of problems and contradictions they’ve created amongst themselves. The new perspective helps straighten that out.

Of course, the best sounding boards aren’t always around when you need them, so I’ve figured out some strategies for coaxing whoever is around and willing. The first step is recognizing when someone (however nice a person) is not constitutionally suited for sounding boarding. Sometimes people don’t think in terms of solutions, or only in poking holes in possible solutions you present to them, never offering any of their own. This’ll wear you down like nobody’s business, though it gives a sense of forward movement for a while, because you’re ruling things out. There’s no fresh perspective being added, though.

So you have a good candidate. What next? What I do at writing workshops with new people is present the problem they pointed out, paired with a solution I just thought of myself. It’s amazing how many people are able to say “Yes, that would solve it!” or “Wouldn’t that have unintended consequence X? What about Y?” The other strategy is to poll people’s reactions. “My character does X, does that make her more sympathetic?” Then, even if your sounding board isn’t sure about what might make a character sympathetic in abstract, they can react how they would as a reader and you gain that data. And once again, I’m surprised how often, when you set them up that way, people will come up with some different solution for you.

And when all your problems are solved, your story is ready to go!

Posted in novels, thinky thoughts | Leave a comment

Face Off

Longtime readers will be familiar with my love of cooking reality shows, specifically ones that showcase creativity rather than just performance. I’ve found something even better to scratch that itch, which is SyFy’s Face Off, a reality competition show for TV and movie special effects makeup artists. The creativity is paramount, because they’ll prompt them with something like “fear of cold” and they have to create some kind of humanoid creature representation of that. It’s utterly delightful to watch, because you can start to see the creative process, from the seed, to the person’s first sketches, to how it gets modified because of the realities of materials and time.

The reason for the post, though, is that it has me pondering another aspect of competitions. SyFy has edited it together reasonably low drama, compared to some shows on places like, oh, I don’t know, Fox. I don’t know how their editing reflects reality, still, but people’s interactions read as relatively true to life to me, based on my experiences with groups of people all trying to accomplish things, and blowing off steam by bitching about others in the group.

It struck me that social situations call for a delicate balance between no confidence and arrogance. Not enough confidence and you sell yourself short; too much arrogance and people get annoyed, and you quickly lose allies and possible collaborators. And the interesting part is since some of the no confidence/arrogance continuum is about the closeness of the match between how people perceive you as presenting yourself, and what people perceive your real abilities to be, it’s dependent on other people’s biases and wonky perceptions. Then again, at least in the show, often other people were not far wrong, in aggregate. One person would have a grudge or be wrapped up in themself, but the group had a sense. There’s also the old scientific finding about how incompetent people don’t know they’re incompetent. (Because when you’re incompetent you don’t know enough about the field to compare your own skills to anything) But others around the person know.

I’ve been thinking about having and presenting confidence myself, lately (happily in the middle between no confidence and arrogance). Gauging and adjusting to the perceptions of the people around you seems a little crazy-making (seems likely to lead you astray later in life, if you end up in, say, grad school at one end, or with a cult fan following at the other), but something I also noticed in the show was you didn’t necessarily have to do that. You didn’t represent your skills much at all, positive or negative, you just used them and let people decide. You came off as confident because you didn’t denigrate yourself, and not arrogant because you weren’t presenting anything greater than your skills (by presenting nothing at all!).

Of course, there’s a time and a place for selling yourself (like getting onto the competition show), but this post is too long already, and I think it’s an interesting mental exercise, to consider when it might not be the time to sell yourself, just use your skills and shut up about it so you seem confident.

And now for something completely different, because it amused me so much…a lolwulf!

Posted in movies and TV, thinky thoughts | Tagged as: | 2 Comments

Gunslinger

A short update this week–the aching back of my throat is telling me that I’d better get some things wrapped up tonight, because a cold, she is a loomin’.

Had my first experience shooting at a range today, on a package deal with my coworker. A very interesting experience, one I’ve glad to have had (yes, partially for writing research, and partially for my I am an Interesting Person who has Done Shit file). It feels a little like trying an exotic cuisine for the first time: it’s cool and I can tell I would probably like it if I tried it several more times, but right now…I’m done for a bit.

There should be more urban fantasy archery battles. Bows are awesome! (Also, I have used them often enough my aim is significantly less shitty…)

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged as: | Leave a comment